FAQ on PPF’s election proposal
Your candidacy has been proposed by PPF Group. What is your affiliation with the Group?
I stand for election as an independent candidate and do not have an affiliation with PPF Group or CME.
PPF already has one seat on the Supervisory Board of ProSiebenSat.1. Why should PPF have another seat through your election?
PPF has not proposed me as their representative on the Supervisory Board. I am proposed by PPF as a fully independent Supervisory Board member, as defined under German corporate governance guidelines.
Why does the Supervisory Board of ProSiebenSat.1 need a candidate like you?
The challenges of linear and digital television have in general been identified by the management of ProSiebenSat.1 but they have not been resolved yet. I believe that with my long-standing experience in successful media transformations, I can make a valuable contribution at the Supervisory Board level towards addressing the challenges ProSiebenSat.1 is facing.
During my career in television and broadcasting, I have gained plenty of experience with similar situations and successfully turned businesses around. I am well equipped to advise the company on how to best repair its entertainment business and return it to former levels of profitability.
Why do you think that ProSiebenSat.1 did not show any improvement in 2023?
There are several reasons:
- 2023 proved to be a difficult market environment regarding advertising spend;
- The audience performance of ProSiebenSat.1 further declined due to a lack of attractive local content and the suboptimal positioning of channels;
- The alignment of linear and digital offers is still at the beginning;
- Cost structure remains too high;
- Strategy execution has been too slow.
How do you believe that you can contribute to addressing those points?
One of the major challenges for ProSiebenSat.1 is to execute its strategy to improve on the performance of its main and secondary channels in combination with a digital transformation process. When it comes to channel positioning, sales and distribution as well as restructuring, I believe that I can enable the Board to better support the management in what needs to be done, as I have done successfully at previous points in my career.
Do you see any conflict of interest for you concerning the relation between PPF and MFE and other shareholders going forward?
No. If elected to the Supervisory Board, I would be an independent member and thus would work in the interest of all shareholders and stakeholders. All shareholders naturally want to see their investments generate a positive return. I therefore obviously feel an obligation to all shareholders to use my skills and experience to make a valuable contribution to the further development of ProSiebenSat.1.
ProSiebenSat. 1's largest shareholder, MFE, has announced resolutions for shareholders to vote on requiring the company to take all necessary steps to divest ProSiebenSat. 1's non-core assets, including their possible spin-off, and refocus on its entertainment activities. What do you think?
From the outside looking in, ProSiebenSat.1 management needs to focus on improving the company’s entertainment business. For the so-called non-core activities, it should strive for a solution that creates the best value for all shareholders. If elected, I will, together with the other members of the Supervisory Board, examine the management's plan in detail and with an open mind.